Pope Francis is Right: Death Row has no place in Catholicism

On August 2, 2018, Pope Francis ordered a revision to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, updating it to describe the death penalty as “inadmissible” and an “attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person.” In Evangelium Vitae, St. Pope John Paul II identified a contradiction in contemporary culture. “Precisely in an age when the inviolable rights of the person are solemnly proclaimed and the value of life is publicly affirmed,” he lamented, “the very right to life is being denied or trampled upon, especially at the more significant moments of existence: the moment of birth and the moment of death.”

It continues to amaze me that the minute Pope Francis makes a public statement regarding the protection of human dignity and human life, the critics pour out of their closets to disagree and attack. Among these are bishops, priests, theologians, and Christians. Yet a large number of Catholics are scandalized and wonder why this strong disagreement with the Supreme Pastor of the Catholic Church. Capital Punishment is not dogma they say. Are there two Holy Spirits guiding us: one for the critics, one for the Pope? Absolutely not, Jesus clearly states the Holy Spirit, “… will guide you to all truth”. How? He guides us through the Church, through the Magisterium, through the successor of Peter who is Pope Francis. The current set of critics cannot see the Truth, they cannot see in the Holy Spirit the face of truth which is the face of God.

What is the function of the Pope, what is his role? Jesus appointed Peter and his successors to be Pastors, to be His leading Presence in the world. The Pope is to be a Supreme Pastor, a Supreme Shepherd who looks after ALL his people. (John 21,15-17). The Pope is a sign of God’s love. Scripture tells us that standing before God everyone is equal, no matter how small, how deformed, how good, how bad. The Pope is a man of the people. He understands how they live, they suffer, how they search for happiness, in short, this Shepherd must open the doors so that those on the fringes of society may find their way back to God, the source of their happiness. (Luke 15:11-32). So far, mercy and compassion have been characteristics that have marked the papacy of Pope Francis. All men and women are created equally in God’s image, they all merit human dignity.

In the Bible when God speaks of Justice, it is never separated from Mercy. The critics limit their debate to only Justice. No one denies the Justice due in Capital Punishment, not even Pope Francis. Through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, the Pope speaks of Justice and Mercy as one unit, one set which equals “Love of neighbor”, the Catholic definition as found in the Scriptures. However, Mercy is seldom mentioned by critics. How far should Mercy apply to Capital Punishment? The answer lies in our relationship to God. How far should God’s Mercy apply to us? When a Christian asks for forgiveness, how much Mercy does he or she want from God? 10%. 40%. 70%. 100%. This is how far we should apply Mercy to Capital Punishment.

To this same extent, Justice, Mercy, and capital punishment are related. “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Who is my neighbor? Whoever you meet or see today is your neighbor. But is “identifying” the real issue here? Rather than trying to figure out who our neighbor is, should we not look at the “man who acts in mercy”. For a moment, let’s stop asking, “Who is my neighbor?” There is a deeper area to ponder. The decisive question should be: “What kind of person am I?” Am I going to be like this Samaritan who gives help when help is needed? (Mercy) Or are we going to be caught up in questions about who we’re supposed to help, and when and where and how. (Justice)

In the past, the Church indicated that capital punishment was not in principle morally wrong, yet unnecessary in the vast majority of cases. Now the Catechism will teach that the death penalty is “inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person.” The change in teaching here draws out what is implicit in previous teachings. Pope St. John Paul II in Evangelium Vitae (The Gospel of Life) had already taught, “Not even a murderer loses his personal dignity, and God himself pledges to guarantee this” (9).

The development of the teaching on capital punishment only absolutizes the pastoral conclusion made by John Paul II. This change is very central to the New Testament: that we are called to love even our enemies; that we are to do good to those who hate us; to imitate God, who causes the rain to fall both on the good and the evil – a teaching we very much need to hear in our comfortable affluent culture.

Rightwing Catholic critics may not agree, but the unequivocal defense of human life is in line with the church’s teachings. The church has always taught the defense of human life from conception to natural death, but the way that has been applied was dictated by a mentality more legalistic than Christian.

The new change centers on an important word: “TODAY, however, …” What this means is that “regardless of how it is carried out”, the death penalty is “per se contrary to the gospel, because it entails the willful suppression of a human life that never ceases to be sacred in the eyes of its creator and of which – ultimately – only God is the true judge and guarantor”. YESTERDAY, it was “the only viable way to effectively defend the life of human beings from the unjust aggressor”. (CC No. 2267) That was yesterday. “TODAY, however, …”

 

  God Bless
    Jerry Novotny, OMI

 

******************* 

Websites by Fr. Jerry

(English) LifeIssues.net

(English) Fighting for the Culture of Life – Fr. Jerry’s Blog

(JapaneseJapan-lifeissues.net

(JapaneseHuman Rights: The Road to a Happy Life – Fr. Jerry’s Blog

2 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by DrJeffKoloze on August 26, 2018 at 12:20 pm

    Yeah, as someone against capital punishment, I agree. Too bad Pope Francis’ moral authority has been eviscerated by the new disclosures that he did nothing (protected, even?) that abuser, former Cardinal McCarrick. What a disgrace that Pope Francis didn’t have the courage to stand up to such homosexual behavior–committed against seminarians, too. This article is damning against the pope.

    Reply

    • I would not condemn our Holy Father too quickly on the basis of one article. To what extent he knew what was taking place is yet to be established. He has made mistakes, some of which appear to have been made due to ignorance, not having all the facts presented to him. His papacy in defense of the poor has been outstanding, his presence is always with them. His moral authority concerning capital punishment is solid. I do not question it. Your comment deals mostly with Cardinal McCarrick and the abuser issue. This is a topic for another article Jeff and I agree, it is shocking and scandalizing, really difficult to comprehend the depth of the problem.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: